•2014/11/24 • Leave a Comment
For Final Fantasy Completionists Only.
This game is what happens when you decide that instead of fixing any game play problems with your remake, you could just give it pretty graphics. Because you don’t really get to keep abilities, certain job classes (Red Mage, Geomancer, Dragoon, Summoner, Sage) are clearly superior to others, to the point where it ruins any potential replay value. The game also very overtly warns you which classes you should be at certain times by the equipment it gives you.
The game suffered from very quick difficulty spikes, which was one reason I gave up on it on first purchase. Nothing bothers me quite as much as being forced to grind levels to survive. Additionally, because the game’s battle timing system is essentially random outside of a few job classes, you’ll just have no way to beat some bosses if the RNG decides you’re eating the two best attacks in a row before you can heal. It’s cheap, and it almost made me surrender before I remembered that I’m a completionist.
By acknowledging that this game had a story, I put more effort into the review of the story than the developers put into the story.
•2014/11/04 • Leave a Comment
It’s impossible for me to read a George Saunders book and not recommend it to you. This one tended to be a little less absurd than most of his short-story collections. Instead, Saunders focused on a few main themes: drugs and altered consciousness, people breaking out of established social norms in the name of kindness, and the illusion of kindness in general. In the world Saunders created in most of these short stories, the world quashes your desire to be kind at every turn. Usually through situations or people who make it impossible to do so without punishment.
The story that resonated most with me was the title track. An old sufferer of Alzheimer’s is trying to freeze himself to death, only to see a young kid bringing his discarded jacket to him. The boy falls through a frozen-over pond before he could get there. As someone who also had a father consumed with the dignity of keeping his suffering to himself, this passage was quite prescient to me:
He was a father. That’s what a father does.
Eases the burdens of those he loves.
Saves the ones he loves from painful last images that might endure for a lifetime.
•2013/11/18 • Leave a Comment
It’s up on Football Outsiders now:
Baylor’s starting quarterback checked out with 6:34 to play in the game, 63 points in hand. The Bears got off to a horrendous start, and were down 20-7 late in the first quarter. Two of Baylor’s three players with over 800 yards from scrimmage on the season, Lache Seastrunk and Tevin Reese, didn’t play. Their top receiver, Antwan Goodley, had 101 yards and a touchdown and it felt like he left about 150 more on the field. They committed 12 penalties for 108 yards. None of it really came close to mattering.
I took this in, live and in person, at Jerryworld in Dallas. (I resisted, for the most part, the urge to watch the gigantic TV screen in front of my face rather than the game itself.) What I saw was the exhausting, inexorable march of football being dragged into the future by Art Briles.
Read the whole thing here.
•2013/11/18 • 1 Comment
It’s (been) up on ESPN ($) for awhile. My apologies for not linking it earlier.
As weird as it would have sounded at the beginning of the season, the New York Jets are in the driver’s seat for the last wild-card berth in the AFC.
Yes, that’s a statement that is stripped of the depressing context that there isn’t really a worthy sixth playoff team in the AFC this year — but it still rings true. Through 10 weeks, the Jets are the only AFC team that isn’t the Denver Broncos or a division leader to be over .500. And their closest competitors for the final spot, the Miami Dolphins, have plenty of issues on the field and off.
But can the Jets hold on and secure the AFC’s final wild-card spot?
Read the whole thing here, if you are an ESPN insider.
•2013/11/11 • 1 Comment
It’s up on Football Outsiders.
So we said last week that coaches were trading about 20 percent of their success rate on roughly 25 percent of third-and-longs to go conservative. After looking at the upsides of conservative coaching, what they are receiving in exchange is less downs with a replacement-level sack rate (about 2.4 percent difference) and about an 0.5 percent less chance of throwing a pick.
Yes, I’m aware that some of this can be chalked up to game theory. I’m also aware that some of this conservative coaching is coming in field position areas where gaining a few yards can set up a long field-goal attempt rather than a short punt or a fourth-down decision
Still, I can’t help but feel like some coaches are sacrificing a few too many third-and-longs to conservative thinking. There are specific instances where it may make more sense — immobile quarterback, leaky offensive line — but even if we say the Adjusted Sack Rate should hit 20 percent on those sorts of plays, it’s a stretch to say that it’s not smarter to throw the ball past the sticks.
Read the whole thing here.
•2013/11/11 • Leave a Comment
It’s up on ESPN ($) now:
At this point in the season, no one is surprised that the Seattle Seahawks’ defense is dominant (except against Mike Glennon, of course) and no one is expecting the Jacksonville Jaguars to make a miraculous playoff run.
But even contenders like the Seahawks aren’t without problems. We’ve previously examined a potential problem area for the Bengals, but let’s take a look at the biggest weakness for the other top contenders in the AFC and the NFC and how each team can solve the issue before the playoffs.
Read the whole thing here if you have ESPN Insider.
•2013/11/04 • Leave a Comment
It’s up on Football Outsiders:
If we know one thing about NFL coaches though, it’s that they aren’t exactly acting on rational game theory at all times. If the fourth-down revolution actually is over, as Mike Tanier declared, maybe this can be the new front. As a fan of a team that ran nearly nine percent of all third-and-long run plays last season, I can tell you that conservatism is not an uncommon theme in these situations. Teams often do decide that playing it safe is the best course of action.
I decided to dig into our 2012 charting database (we haven’t put together 2013 yet) to have a look at how often this happens, and try to project exactly what some certain coaches are protecting against.
Read the whole thing here.